In an opinion piece two weeks in the past, R.J. Ogaard claimed the left-wing media was operating a smear marketing campaign on President Trump, however on the similar time, the letter he wrote was simply that – a smear piece.
He would have you ever imagine the mainstream information reporting is all extremely biased rubbish. Luckily, that is simply not true. Numerous research have investigated and located that information sources such because the AP, Bloomberg, Reuters, Nationwide Public Radio, ABC Information, CBS information, Politico, The Wall Avenue Journal, The New York Instances, and the Los Angeles Instances typically report factual and accountable information. A few of these sources, like Politico, could also be a bit liberal. Others, just like the Wall Avenue Journal could also be a bit conservative. Even so, they’re dependable sources of knowledge.
Ogaard claims that media shops just like the above are ignoring the details and simply lashing out at Trump as a result of they don’t like him. He wrote, “Those self same information sources at the moment are scapegoating Trump, with a body that he didn’t reply to COVID-19 rapidly sufficient.” Properly, it’s a proven fact that Trump’s response was too little too late. In late January, Trump mentioned, “We have now it completely underneath management. It’s one individual coming in from China.” In late February, simply when Italy was locking down whole cities, Trump declared, “The Coronavirus could be very a lot underneath management within the USA.” Clearly it wasn’t underneath management then, it nonetheless isn’t now, and these are important points that must be within the information.
One blatant omission from Ogaard’s piece is any point out of conservative media. He writes that company media is after three issues: “Energy. Cash. Standing.” Does that embrace Fox Information? What concerning the Grand Forks Herald? He doesn’t say, and that highlights an enormous downside in his letter.
He says we must always mistrust company media, apart from a couple of firms – those that match his excessive political opinions.